 |
"Napoli Magazine" has followed, minute by minute, the day on the use of Naples, which 'was rejected by the Court of Federal Justice 19:42. After four hours of deliberation and two hours of discussion, and 'was therefore confirmed the disqualification of three rounds to Lavezzi, who will miss Napoli-Catania, Napoli-Milan-Naples and Brescia.
THE DIRECT LINE OF "NAPOLI MAGAZINE"
16:05 PM - It ended at 16:00 to discuss the appeal of the disqualification of Naples after 3 rounds of Lavezzi, sports Tosel decided by the judge. The Judges judging from the first section of the Federal Court of Justice, headed by Gerardo Mastrandrea, a former State Councillor and Head of Legal Department of Infrastructure, will know whether the use of the emergency presented by Naples' was accepted or rejected. The sentence you will know 'after 18:00. Meanwhile, the first sprouting rumors, 'cause it seems that the judges have pulled out of another movie which highlights a "response" of the Few. There might be only thus reducing the disqualification from 3 to 2 days, but at the moment we are only assumptions.
ORE 18:25 - We are awaiting the ruling. The news is not 'yet been announced.
18:30 PM - The Naples, however, lawyers have pointed the finger during the trial, the lack of clarity of television images.
18:43 PM - Having met the judges with a slight delay compared to the program, which is why 'there is this delay in the decision.
ORE 19:06 - now expects only the ad, which should arrive soon.
ORE 19:10 - The Chambers. Mattia Grassani , lawyer for Naples, has said on Radio Marte: "The movie" Controcampo? Are the same images of Sky, made of gray, where according to the judges see something. And 'that amicable a movie like this is repeated in the last instance. I refrain from any trial. arrive 7:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. For 'the sentence , lagging in the program. "
19:19 PM - Matt Grassani comment on the hearing that was held at the Federal Court of Justice an appeal against the disqualification of the Napoli Ezequiel Lavezzi: "The judges are still in the Council Chamber. Grassani afternoon to confirm rumors of" Mars Live Sport: "The Court has presented us with a new movie from Controcampo Sunday 13 February and commented by Gianluca Paparesta. There is an enlargement of the evidence that may create a little 'clearer. We are absolutely opposed and we recorded the ineligibility of this new movie. The judge had imposed the ban Tosel with pictures of Sky . It 's a strange situation, certainly there un'irritualità in this process. "
19:42 PM: Complaint with request for urgent procedure SSC NAPOLI SpA against the sanction of disqualification for 3-day period imposed race Ezequiel Ivan Lavezzi the player following a confidential report of the Federal Prosecutor, ex art. 35, paragraph 1.3 in respect of the CGS competition Rome / Naples on 02/12/2011 (Decision of the Judge at the National Professional League Serie A - Com no. No 135 of 02.14.2011) - DISMISSED
20:06 PM: The statement on Football Federation's website: Confirm three-match suspension to a player at Napoli Ezequiel Lavezzi: The Federal Court of Justice, met today in Rome, dismissed the appeal as a matter of urgency presented by the Neapolitan society in order to race Rome-Naples on February 12 last year. Also rejected appeals from Lecce for the two-match ban imposed on the technician Luigi De Canio and the player Guillermo Giacomazzi.
20:13 PM: The lawyer. Mattia Grassani comments speaking on Mars Live Sport dismissed the appeal by the Federal Court of Justice immediately after the verdict: "There 's been worse as he could not go. The disappointment is huge. This kind of proceeding with magnified images has been a huge burden on the pronunciation of the judges. We are not satisfied, we must accept it. De Laurentiis and Fassone I heard, they were very bitter . We had discussed on the basis of images of Sky and present a new source of evidence. "
20:20 PM: A Sky Sport 24, the lawyer. Grassani added:" I understand the reasoning. The new movie has changed the framework of the tests. The provocative and caused were treated with the same penalty. Certainly acquired before the new movie could have done something different. "
20:26 PM: Paul Rodella, adv. Lavezzi, Sky Sport 24, said:" If it 's true that Lavezzi spit? What a client tells his lawyer remains between the parties. I have not talked to Lavezzi. We found ourselves faced with a document other than television. The action and 'was rejected. It 'was a novelty'. From the technical point of view the tv document could not be accepted for the proceedings. "
SOURCE
Antonio Petrazzuolo
Naples Magazine
0 comments:
Post a Comment